Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada, [1999] 4 F.C. 3 (T.D.), has been reversed in part on appeal (A-338-99). The reasons for judgment, handed down 22/12/00, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

Biao v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2000] 2 F.C. 348 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-752-99, Biao v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2000] 2 F.C. 348), reasons for judgment handed down 28/2/01.

Ranganathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 4 F.C. 269 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A-348-99). The reasons for judgment, handed down 21/12/00, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

Bhagwandass v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2000] 1 F.C. 619 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-850-99, Bhagwandass v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2000] 1 F.C. 619). The reasons for judgment handed down 7/3/01, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

Chiau v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 2 F.C. 642 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-75-98). The reasons for judgment, handed down 12/12/00, will be reported in the Federal Court Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Applications for leave to appeal

Fletcher Challenge Canada Ltd. v. Canada, [2001] 1 F.C. 89 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 29/3/01.

Moffatt v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), A-679-97, Isaac J.A., judgment dated 7/4/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 22/3/01.

Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., [2001] 1 F.C. 495 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted, 15/3/01.

Édutile Inc. v. Automobile Protection Assn., [2000] 4 F.C. 195 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 25/1/01.

Archibald v. Canada, [2000] 4 F.C. 479 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 15/3/01.

Jaworski v. Canada (Attorney General), [2000] 4 F.C. D-27 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 25/1/01.

Entreprises A.B. Rimouski Inc. v. Canada, A-647-98, Noël J.A., judgment dated 18/4/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 29/3/01.

Anraj Fish Products Industries Ltd. v. Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., [2000] 4 F.C. D-18 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 22/3/01.

ITT Industries of Canada Ltd. v. Canada, A-99-99, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 20/7/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 29/3/01.

Bell v. Canada, [2000] 4 F.C. D-19 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 8/2/01.

Mailloux v. Canada, A-390-98, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 17/5/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 29/3/01.

Metro-Can Construction Ltd. v. Canada, [2000] 4 F.C. D-39 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 15/3/01.

Del Zotto v. M.N.R., [2000] 4 F.C. 321 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 1/3/01.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.